SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1172

GHULAM MOHAMMED, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Government Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
G. Jaya Prasad Rao – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS batch of writ petitions may be disposed of by a common order since a! of them arc directed against the common judgment dated 12-7-2002 made in o. A. No. 9461 of 2001 and Batch by the andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal.

( 2 ) AGGRIEVED by the said commonjudgment of fee Tribunal, the Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its principal Secretary to Government together with the Director General and Inspector general of Police, Andhra Pradesh invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of india and accordingly pray for issuance of a writ of Certiorari after calling for the records relating to and connected with the said common judgment of the Tribunal and quash the same.

( 3 ) IN order to consider the correctness ofthe judgment rendered by the Tribunal, it may be necessary to notice the relevant facts leading to filing of this writ petition.

( 4 ) THE respondents in this batch of writpetitions are the Inspectors of Police working at various places and in various wings in the Police Department in the State of Andhra Pradesh. Most of them are working as Inspectors of Police in the city of hyderabad.



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top