( 1 ) THE 2nd defendant in O. S. No. 164 of 1993 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, mahabubnagar is the revision petitioner. He impugnes the incidental order passed by the said Court in O. S. No. 164 of 1993 dated 4-4-2002. Be it noted that while passing the said order, the learned trial Judge held that the unregistered gift deed dated 17-5-1988 produced by the petitioner during trial is not admissible in evidence.

( 2 ) THE 1st respondent herein filed a suit for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties. The petitioner herein who is defendant No. 2 filed a written statement alleging that the land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 6. 00 comprised in Survey Nos. 164 and 167 was gifted to him by the plaintiff and that he has been in possession of the said land since then. The matter went for trial. At that time, the petitioner on his own volition submitted the document before the Revenue Divisional officer (Registrar) and the same was impounded for not paying proper stamp duty. Be that as it may, the plaintiff examined herself as P. W. 1 and marked exs. A-1 to A-4. The petitioner herein examined himself as D. W. 1 and also examined D. W. 2 and D