SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1213

MOTILAL B.NAIK, DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM
Municipal Rate Payers Association, Anantapur – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. Municipal Administration and Urban Development – Respondent


MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) IN all these writ petitions the controversy involved is about the assessment of property tax of the building located in the limits of different municipalities in the State of andhra Pradesh.

( 2 ) FEW petitioners have sought a mandamus declaring the rules framed under G. O. Ms. No. 438, dated 29-10-1990 and the notification dated 8-2-2002 and the final notification No. 30/02 dated 1-3-2002 as illegal, arbitrary and ultravires the provisions of the A. P. Municipalities Act and violative of the rights of the citizens guaranteed under Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India.

( 3 ) FEW of the petitioners have sought a direction by calling for the records relating to and in connection with G. O. Ms. No. 167, m. A. , dated 18-4-2002 issued by the government of Andhra Pradesh and also sought to set aside the same as being violative of Part IX-A of the Constitution of india and Articles 14, 19, 300-A of the constitution of India and Chapter I of part IV of the A. P. Municipalities Act.

( 4 ) IN another set of writ petitions, a writ of Mandamus is sought declaring the notification issued in Form-B whereunder enhanced property tax is sought to be collecte





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top