MOTILAL B.NAIK, DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM
Municipal Rate Payers Association, Anantapur – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. Municipal Administration and Urban Development – Respondent
( 1 ) IN all these writ petitions the controversy involved is about the assessment of property tax of the building located in the limits of different municipalities in the State of andhra Pradesh.
( 2 ) FEW petitioners have sought a mandamus declaring the rules framed under G. O. Ms. No. 438, dated 29-10-1990 and the notification dated 8-2-2002 and the final notification No. 30/02 dated 1-3-2002 as illegal, arbitrary and ultravires the provisions of the A. P. Municipalities Act and violative of the rights of the citizens guaranteed under Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India.
( 3 ) FEW of the petitioners have sought a direction by calling for the records relating to and in connection with G. O. Ms. No. 167, m. A. , dated 18-4-2002 issued by the government of Andhra Pradesh and also sought to set aside the same as being violative of Part IX-A of the Constitution of india and Articles 14, 19, 300-A of the constitution of India and Chapter I of part IV of the A. P. Municipalities Act.
( 4 ) IN another set of writ petitions, a writ of Mandamus is sought declaring the notification issued in Form-B whereunder enhanced property tax is sought to be collecte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.