SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1349

S.R.NAYAK, DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM
District Collector, R. R. Dist. – Appellant
Versus
G. Dayakar – Respondent


DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THE three Writ Appeals are filed by the respondents in W. P. Nos. 7364 and 10308 of 2000 against the common order dt. 17-8-2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of this court allowing those two writ petitions. W. P. No. 20530 of 2002 is filed by five petitioners therein requesting this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct survey by the Regional Deputy Director of Survey and land Records, Hyderabad, of the land in S. No. 67 of Madhapur village, serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy district with reference to the land possessed by the petitioners and also the land held by the 3rd respondent. As common questions of law and facts arise in the Writ Appeals and the Writ Petition, we are disposing of the writ appeals as well as the writ petition by a common order.

( 2 ) THE Government is the owner of the land situated in Sy. No. 64 of Madhapur village of Serilingampally Mandal of Ranga reddy District. In or about the year 1992 the government allotted about Ac. 45-00 of its land in Sy. No. 64 of Madhapur village to shilparamam and inducted the later into possession of the said land. The adjoining land in Sy. No. 67 app








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top