SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 183

V.V.S.RAO
Jalal and Sons – Appellant
Versus
Sita Bai (Died) – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) IN this tenant s revision under Section 22 of Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (hereinafter called the Act ), the first petitioner is the proprietary concern and the second petitioner is proprietor of the first petitioner (hereinafter compendiously called as tenant ). The tenant is aggrieved by the order of the Court of Additional Chief judge, City Small Causes Court, hyderabad, dt. 24-3-2000 in R. A. No. 47 of 1995, confirming the eviction order passed by the Court of III Additional Rent controller, Hyderabad, in R. C. No. 1084 of 1986 dt. 31-12-1994. The order of the appellate authority is impugned on the ground that the same is vitiated by irregularity and illegality. The parties are referred to as they are arrayed in Rent control Case.--

( 2 ) THE tenant is running business in the name and style of M/s. Jalal and Sons. The tenant was inducted in 1938. The tenant runs a watch repair and sales shop in suit mulgi bearing premises No. 5-8-543. The shop admeasures 15 x 60 and is situated in busy commercial area of Hyderabad, known as Abid Road. Originally, lease was obtained by late Syed Jalaluddin, the father of the pre















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top