SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 170

S.B.SINHA
Explosives Consultation and Application Pte. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
IDL Industries Ltd. – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS application under S. 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act ) has been filed by the petitioner herein for appointment of arbitrator for adjudication of the claims and disputes between the parties hereto.

( 2 ) A Distribution Agreement dated 1-1-1993 had been entered into between the parties for distribution of the explosives and other accessories manufactured by the respondent herein. Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the applicant made several requests for referring the disputes to an arbitrator making a claim of US $ 707,710. 80 covering FOB value of defective goods delivered and disbursement costs incurred by it on several counts. The respondent in its letter dated 15-2-2000 recorded that the claim of US $ 707,710. 80 against the total FOB value of US $ 279,988. 40 is totally unsustainable and contrary to the specific terms agreed upon governing the supply. It was further recorded that as per General Terms of Sale, the maximum liability of IDL is US $ 279,988. 40. Thereafter, the applicant issued a notice on 10-3-2000 which is in the following terms :"mr. R. M. Unnisenior Executive Directoridl Industries Limi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top