SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 154

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY
Gangavath Lalu – Appellant
Versus
Gangavathi Tulsi – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 13-11-2000 on the file of the Agent to Government, Khammam.

( 2 ) THE Agent to Government dismissed the interlocutory application filed by the petitioner under Order 39, Rule 1, CPC seeking temporary injunction against the respondent.

( 3 ) BEFORE adverting to the question that falls for consideration, it may be necessary to briefly notice the relevant facts :the petitioner is the plaintiff in the main suit. The petitioner and the husband of the respondent-defendant are brothers and they are sons of one late Vasya. The said Vasya died on 12-1-1994. It is the case of the petitioner that his father during his lifetime has acquired the suit schedule land and was the absolute owner and possessor of the same. It is also his case that his father late Vasya executed Will deed dated 26-8-1993 bequeathing the schedule properties in his favour. However, the Mandal Revenue Officer ignoring the claim of the petitioner mutated the property in the revenue records in his mother s name. 4-5. The petitioner s mother during her lifetime executed a registered Will deed No. 59/95 dated
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top