SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 327

S.B.SINHA, V.V.S.RAO
Mohd. Ahmed Ali – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in this application have inter alia prayed for the following reliefs:". . . . . . . . . . THIS Hon ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the Act No. 27/98 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the orders passed by the Hon ble Supreme Court in Civil appeal Nos. 82 and 83 of 1999, dated 11-1-1999 and Civil Appeal No. 1867 and 1868 of 1999, dated 26-3-1999 and further direct the respondents as supervisors (Assistant Engineers)/ Tracer in the existing vacancies in terms of g. O. Ms. No. 212, Finance and Planning dated 22-4-1994 and G. O. Ms. No. 330, ma, dated 24-9-1994 and also as per the judgments of the Hon ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 82 and 83 of 1999 dated 11-1-1999 and civil appeal No. 1867 and 1868 of 1999, dated 26-3-1999 without insisting the completion of 5 years of service as on 25-11-1993 by declaring that they are entitled for regularisation from the date of completion of 5 years of service and eligible to draw the scale of Supervisors/assistant engineers/tracer from the date of completion of 5 years of service






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top