SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 212

S.B.SINHA, S.R.NAYAK
Ch. Anita – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THE only question that arises for our consideration and decision in these Writ Appeals and Writ Petitions is whether cancellation of admission of the petitioners/ appellants to B. Ed. course during the Academic year 1999-2000 by the Principal, Government Institute of Advanced Study in Education (for short, "iase"), Masab Tank, Hydrabad, the common 4th respondent in these writ appeals and writ petitions, is legal and justified in the facts and circumstances of the case.

( 2 ) WRIT Appeal No. 19 of 2000 is directed against the interim order dated 29-12-2000 passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in WPMP No. 33525 of 2000 filed in W. P. No. 26348 of 2000 refusing to suspend the proceedings of the 4th respondent dated 23-12-2000, whereby and whereunder the admissions of the petitioners/appellants are cancelled. Writ Appeal No. 6 of 2000 is directed against the interim order passed by the learned single Judge dated 29-12-2000 in WPMP No. 33620 of 2000 filed in WP No. 26432 of 2000 declining to suspend the above proceedings of the 4th respondent. In W. P. No. 26348 of 2000 and W. P. No. 26432 of 2000, the validity and legality of the proceedings of the 4th





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top