SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 678

P.S.NARAYANA
Kadali Pullayya – Appellant
Versus
Kadali Narasanna – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is directed against an order dated 22-8-1990 made in e. A. NO. 18 of 1990 in O. S. No. 50 of 1974 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, razole.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in brief are as follows: While taking execution for delivery of possession of the petition schedule property, delivery warrant was issued and however the delivery could not be effected since there was some obstruction and application for taking steps had been filed and it was ordered that the property should be delivered on 17-4-1990 and on that day the delivery warrant was returned unexecuted stating that one K. Pullaiah and his family members had obstructed the delivery on the ground that they had purchased these properties by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 14-5-1981 from the judgment debtors, the respondents 2 and 3 in the present revision. The third party objector who is the present revision petitioner also had filed a memo stating that he is not a party to the proceedings and by virtue of the sale deed he had acquired independent title to the property and hence notice should be ordered and the matter has to be proceeded with in accordance w









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top