SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 715

GHULAM MOHAMMED
M. Ravinder Raju – Appellant
Versus
S. Bansilal – Respondent


GHULAM MOHAMMED, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition has been filed by the landlord under Section 22 of the A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) control Act, 1960 for short "the Rent control Act", aggrieved by the order dated 3-4-1995 passed in R. A. No. 225 of 1994 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City small Causes Court at Hyderabad, reversing the order of eviction passed in r. C. No. 248 of 1987 dated 23-3-1994 by the iv Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) IT is stated that the suit mulgi bearing no. 2-4-1948, Nimboli Adda, Hyderabad was let out to the respondent for the purpose of carrying on business on a monthly rent of Rs. 80. 00. The revision petitioner filed the R. C. No. 248 of 1987 before the Rent Controller, Hyderabad, under Section 10 (2) (v); and 3 (iii) of the Rent control Act seeking eviction of the respondent. It is stated that the respondent closed the mulgi for the last four years and he is not carrying on the business, that the respondent committed wilful default in payment of rent, that the suit mulgi is next to his house, and has additional facility of bath room and latrine which is not available in other mulgies, therefore he requires the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top