SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 707

P.S.NARAYANA
Biruduvolu Haranadha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India, Agricultural development Branch, kovur, rep. by its Branch Manager – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil revision petition is filed by the revision petitioner-second judgment debtor against an order made in E. A. No. 372 of 1998 in E. P. No. 34 of 1992 in O. S. No. 1 of 1989 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, kovur dated 2-2-1999.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in brief are that the first respondent in the revision, the decree holder filed a suit O. S. No. 1 of 1989 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Kovur against the father of the revision petitioner for realization of the loan amount and the suit was decreed. The present petitioner was brought on record as the legal representative of the defendant in the suit. The respondent No. 1 to execute the said money decree, had filed E. P. No. 34 of 1992 and brought the properties of the revision petitioner to sale and item No. 4 was auctioned and the second respondent became the successful bidder and auction purchaser. The revision petitioner filed e. A. 372 of 1998 under Or. 21 Rule 89 C. P. C. for setting aside the sale. The said execution application was dismissed by the learned senior Civil Judge, Kovur by order dated 2-2-1999 and aggrieved by the same the present revision petition is filed.

( 3 )















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top