SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 822

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, P.S.NARAYANA
Maddisetti Venkata Rathnamma – Appellant
Versus
Pasupuleti Radhakrishna Murthy – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the Judgment of the learned Single Judge in a. S. NO. 1729/83 dated 28-7-1992 reversing the judgment in O. S. No. 190/72 on the file of additional Subordinate Judge Guntur dated 23-6-1983.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff in the suit and the respondent in the appeal is the appellant in the present Letters Patent Appeal and 2nd defendant-appellant is the 1st respondent and 1st defendant is the 2nd respondent and since the appellant died, in C. M. P. No. 10274/96, appellants 2 to 6 were brought on record. For the purpose of convenience the parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff filed O. S. No. 190/72 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, guntur for partition of the plaint schedule properties into two equal shares and to allot one such share and a preliminary decree was passed on 14-2-1977 in respect of Item nos. 2 and 3 and the suit was dismissed as far as Item No. 1 of the plaint schedule is concerned. The 2nd defendant in the suit is claiming exclusive right, title and possession over Item No. 1 of the plaint schedule property. The petitioner carried the matter in appeal and the matter was r










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top