SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 803

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, MOTILAL B.NAIK
Sajana Granites, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Manduva Srinlvasa Rao respondents – Respondent


C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFFS 1 and 2 in O. S. No. 158 of 1992 on the file of the Court of the Additional senior Civil Judge. Ongole, are the appellants. Appellants and A. Venkata durgamba (hereinafter referred to as 3rd plaintiff) have filed the aforesaid O. S. No. 158 of 1992 against respondents and five others for (i) a declaration that they (appellants) are the absolute owners of Ac. 5. 73 cents in s. No. 55/6 of Rajupalem Lakshmipuram village within the boundaries mentioned in item No. 1 of plaint schedule, and that 3rd plaintiff is the absolute owner of Ac. 1. 99 cents of land in S. No. 55/6 of Rajupalem lakshmipuram village within the boundaries mentioned in item No. 2 of the plaint schedule; (ii) for a consequential permanent injunction restraining them Venkateswarlu died unmarried and intestate. Srinivasa Rao died leaving behind his wife Vaidehi as his legal heir. Satyanarayana died leaving behind his wife adilakshmi and daughter Sukumari as his legal heirs. A. Venkata Ramanaiah, who is the son of 3rd plaintiff, is the General Power of Attorney of his mother 3rd plaintiff, vaidehi, Adilakshmi and Sukumari. Since mallaiah did not want a share, his sons purushottam a










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top