SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 970

V.V.S.RAO, S.B.SINHA
A. Ratnam – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , Education Department, Hyderabad – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J, J.

( 1 ) ALL these writ petitions are filed questioning the judgment passed by the A. P. Administrative Tribunal in various cases including O. A. Nos. 4496 of 2001 and batch dated 24-7-2001. This judgment shall dispose of all the writ petitions.

( 2 ) AS the facts are almost similar in all the cases, we may take the case as projected in w. P. No. 15469 of 2001 which is filed against O. A. No. 4546 of 2001. The said o. A. was filed under Section 19 of the administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 by the petitioners herein praying for a declaration that the action of the respondents in not conducting the entrance test for crash course in the year 1989 as per notification dated 18-10-1989, and after conducting the same in the year 1995, not permitting the applicants/petitioners to complete the crash course till April 2000 is illegal, unjust, arbitrary, being violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also praying for a consequential direction to the respondents to consider their cases in district Selection Committee selections 2001 ( dsc-2001 for brevity) by granting weightage marks and/or alternatively, to conduct a special DSC so far as the applic





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top