SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1321

S.B.SINHA, V.V.S.RAO
Pennar Paterson Limited – Appellant
Versus
Honble Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No. 1, Nagpur – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) WHETHER the expression "other legal proceedings" occurring in Section 446 (1) of the Companies Act, 1956 does include the criminal proceedings is the question involved in these applications.

( 2 ) APPLICATION No. 179 of 2001 has been filed by the Official Liquidator to direct the first respondent herein to transfer Criminal Complaint No. 1026 of 2000 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nagpur to this Court and to order costs of this application to come out of the assets of the company. Application No. 188 of 2001 has been filed to stay the proceedings in the said criminal complaint.

( 3 ) THIS Court by an order dated 24-11-1999 appointed the Official Liquidator attached to this Court as the Provisional Liquidator of M/s. Pennar Paterson Limited. The liquidator pursuant to the said order took over the assets of the company. It was found that a criminal complaint against the aforementioned company and its Director has been filed knowing that a Provisional Liquidator has been appointed in relation to the said company and without bringing on record the Official Liquidator.

( 4 ) THE learned single Judge, having regard to the fact that this Co
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top