SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1140

P.S.NARAYANA
Pasarlapudi Choultry, Pasarlapudi rep. by its Executive Officer – Appellant
Versus
Kadali Srinivasa Rao – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THESE six Civil Revision Petitions arise out of the Judgments in Small Cause Suit nos. 12, 14, 16, 17, 19 and 25 of 1998 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Razole.

( 2 ) IN all these Civil Revision Petitions, the unsuccessful plaintiff - Pasarlapudi choultry - represented by its Executive officer is the revision petitioner and different tenants under the Institution figure as respondents in all these Civi) Revision petitions. The suits are filed for recovery of arrears of rent from the respective respondents-defendants in these suits on the ground that they are cultivating tenants and they are liable to pay the rents. The respective defendants had filed the written statements denying the averments in the respective plaints and also denying the title of the plaintiff-choultry and claiming title by adverse possession as well. In all these matters, on the strength of the respective pleadings of the parties, the following points were framed for consideration:" (1) Whether there is any complicated question of title of the plaintiff/ choultry, which a Small Cause court cannot finally determine? (2) Whether the defendant is the cultivating tenant of plain










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top