S.ANANDA REDDY
Venkayala Bhadram – Appellant
Versus
Noni Venkata Rao – Respondent
( 2 ) THE Petitioner filed the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1376/- being the principal and interest due on a promissory note dated 7-8-1993 executed by the defendant in favour of the Plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 800/- repayable with interest at rs. 2-00 per month and for subsequent interest and costs. The said suit was filed by the plaintiff on 7-8-1996.
( 3 ) ONE of the contentions advanced by the Defendant was that the suit is barred by limitation. In fact, in the written statement the defendant contended that he has paid the amount at the rate of Rs. 80/- per month towards penal interest and another sum of rs. 400/- during Dasara 1995 towards principal and therefore contended that he had discharged the promissory note executed by him in favour of the plaintiff.
( 4 ) THE Court below without deciding the genuinenss or otherwise of the claim of the defendant with reference to the payments made, though in fact such payments were denied by the plaintiff, but proceeded to decide the issue as to the limitation raised by the d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.