V.V.S.RAO, BILAL NAZKI, S.B.SINHA
B. Rajeswar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
K. Narasimhachari – Respondent
( 1 ) QUESTION :whether calling for applications by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge or the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for appointment in the post of Public Prosecutor/additional Public Prosecutor would amount to soliciting the brief within the meaning of Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") framed by the Bar Council of India and thereby would amount to professional misconduct or not is the question involved in these appeals.
( 2 ) FACTS : pursuant to or in furtherance of the Government Memo N. 34548/courts, A. 2/2000-1, dated 30-9-2000, the Collector and District Magistrate, Hydrabad district sent a letter dated 30-10-2000 to the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad requesting him to send panels along with bio-data particulars for appointment to the posts of Public Prosecutor and Additional Public Prosecutors. In turn, the Metropolitan Sessions Judge by letter dated 15-12-2000, requested the II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-Chief Metropolitan Magistrate to suggest panels whereafter the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate put up a notice in the notice board calling for applications from the advocates w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.