SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1428

BILAL NAZKI, L.NARASIMHA REDDY
M. A. Sultan Mohiuddin – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE question that falls for consideration in these two writ petitions is as to whether in view of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 (Act 15 of 1999) of the Parliament repealing the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (33 of 1976), the provisions of the latter Act are no longer in force in the State of Andhra Pradesh. Since this question arises in both the writ petitions, they are disposed of through a common judgment.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts may be stated as under :- The petitioner in W. P. No. 12781/99 filed declaration under Section 6 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the Ceiling Act ) in respect of the lands held by him in the Vijayawada Urban Agglomeration. The competent authority under the Ceiling Act declared the petitioner as holding 900 sq. mts. of land in excess of ceiling limits. The petitioner filed an application under Section 20 (1) (a) and (1) (b) of the Ceiling Act seeking exemption from the provisions of the Ceiling Act in respect of 900 sq. mts. in NTS 141 of Patamatalanka, Vijayawada. The application was rejected through orders dated 24-3-1998. Challengin














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top