SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 510

R.M.BAPAT, D.S.R.VERMA
Shaik Hasmath Beebi – Appellant
Versus
Dist. Collector and Dist. Magistrate, Kakinada – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Petition is filed by one Smt. Shaik Hasmath Beebi, wife of Shaik Khajavalli, the alleged detenu, seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus declaring that the detention of the alleged detenu as illegal and void.

( 2 ) THE brief facts which are not in dispute are that by an order, dated 3-2-2000, the first respondent-District Collector, East Godavari District, ordered detention of the alleged detenu by exercising jurisdiction under Section 3 (2) read with Section 3 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot Leggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land-Grabbers Act, 1986 (for brevity hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and consequential arrest of the detenu was effected on 5-2-2000. A representation was made to the second respondent-Government and on such representation, the second respondent-Government confirmed the order of the first respondent-District Collector, East Godavari District, on 18-3-2000, on receipt of the report of the Advisory Board. The period of detention was for one year with effect from 5-2-2000. Questioning the same, Writ Petition No. 2691 of 2000 was filed and the same was dism






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top