M.S.LIBERHAN, V.V.S.RAO
Mir Mohd. Ali – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , rep. – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two Public Interest Litigation cases may conveniently be disposed of by a common order as they involve same questions of fact and law. An Advocate, who is the President of A. P. Prison Reforms and Legal Aid Committee, filed W. P. No. 32039 of 1998. He prayed for a direction to the State Government to appoint a High level Commission headed by a sitting or retired High Court Judge, to visit and inspect all the prisons in the State and submit a report concerning the condition of prisons and prisoners with suggestions as to remedial measures, and to direct the state Government to provide proper accommodation and sufficient vehicles and female police escort to transport female prisoners for the purpose of production in the trial Courts, and such other related prayers.
( 2 ) W. P. NO. 6919 of 1999 is filed by a journalist and Social Worker praying for a declaration that the action of the respondents viz. , Government of Andhra pradesh, Director General of Police, and the inspector General of Prisons, in not producing the various Under Trial prisoners (UT prisoners for brevity), before the trial Courts as unconstitutional and for other appropriate directions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.