SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 315

C.V.N.SASTRY
Modem Rajamouli – Appellant
Versus
Modem Roshaiah – Respondent


C. V. N. SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) THE sole plaintiff in the suit is the appellant in this Second Appeal. The appellant filed the suit for partition and separate possession of a 1/9th share in the suit properties and for permanent injunction against defendants 6 to 9, who are the contesting defendants. Subsequently, the plaint was got amended so as to claim the relief of possession also as against defendants 6 to 9.

( 2 ) IT is the case of the plaintiff that the suit property consisting of two items with a total extent of Ac. 9-15 guntas is the ancestral joint family property belonging to plaintiff and defendants 1 to 5. There are altogether three branches, which are entitled to the property. Plaintiff and the 2nd defendant are the sons of the first defendant. They belong to one branch. The 3rd defendant belongs to the 2nd branch. Defendants 4 and 5 belonged to the 3rd branch. Each branch is entitled to a 1/3rd share in the suit property. Out of the 1/3rd share held by the first defendant s branch, the plaintiff is entitled to 1/3rd i. e. , he is entitled to a 1/9th share in the suit property. As the 5th defendant died during the pendency of the suit, his legal representatives were brought o






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top