C.V.N.SASTRY
Modem Rajamouli – Appellant
Versus
Modem Roshaiah – Respondent
( 1 ) THE sole plaintiff in the suit is the appellant in this Second Appeal. The appellant filed the suit for partition and separate possession of a 1/9th share in the suit properties and for permanent injunction against defendants 6 to 9, who are the contesting defendants. Subsequently, the plaint was got amended so as to claim the relief of possession also as against defendants 6 to 9.
( 2 ) IT is the case of the plaintiff that the suit property consisting of two items with a total extent of Ac. 9-15 guntas is the ancestral joint family property belonging to plaintiff and defendants 1 to 5. There are altogether three branches, which are entitled to the property. Plaintiff and the 2nd defendant are the sons of the first defendant. They belong to one branch. The 3rd defendant belongs to the 2nd branch. Defendants 4 and 5 belonged to the 3rd branch. Each branch is entitled to a 1/3rd share in the suit property. Out of the 1/3rd share held by the first defendant s branch, the plaintiff is entitled to 1/3rd i. e. , he is entitled to a 1/9th share in the suit property. As the 5th defendant died during the pendency of the suit, his legal representatives were brought o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.