SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 309

T.CH.SURYA RAO, MOTILAL B.NAIK
State Election Commission – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) BEFORE we decide the principal issue raised in these writ petitions, we briefly narrate the contentions raised in all these writ petitions. WP No. 2481 of 2000: this writ petition is filed by the State election Commission, represented by its secretary, Buddha Bhawan, Secunderabad. Petitioner has questioned the validity of the ordinance No. 3 of 2000 dated 5-2-2000 issued by the State of Andhra Pradesh and the consequential letter dated 10-2-2000 of the first respondent and seeks to quash the same as being untenable and repugnant to Article 243-E (3) of the constitution of India and for issuing appropriate orders.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, as the term of ofice of the Mandal Parishads and zilla Parishads in the State of Andhra pradesh would be expiring on 17-3-2000 and 19-3-2000 respectively, it initiated action for conduct of elections to these bodies by taking appropriate steps, viz. , addressing letters to all the District Collectors instructing them to take all such steps for smooth conduct of elections to Mandal Parishads and Zilla Parishads petitioner-Election commission also issued notification No. 738/ sec-B1/99-20 dated 7-1-2000 notifying t
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top