( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel for the respondent-Corporation sri K. Harinath, and at their request, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

( 2 ) ISSUE Rule Nisi.

( 3 ) THE petitioner was removed from service as a disciplinary measure, after holding a departmental enquiry against him. On his appeal, the punishment of removal imposed by the Disciplinary authority was reduced by the Appellate authority directing reinstatement of the petitioner into service as Conductor imposing a penalty of deferment of annual increment for a period of one year without cumulative effect on his future increments and treating the period of his absence till he reported duty as not on duty . In pursuance of the same, the petitioner reported to duty. At that stage, he was subjected to medical test to find out his suitability to the post. Initially, the Medical officer, who examined the petitioner, found defect in his left eye and held that he is unfit for the post of Conductor in A-2 Category. At the request of the petitioner, he was further subjected to Medical Examination by the Medical Board of the Corporation. The Executive Di