SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 234

A.GOPAL REDDY, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA
A. P. Housing Board – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Sadatullah – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) ALL the writ petitions have been filed to quash the judgment and decree dated 4-9-1995 passed in L. G. C. No. 137/89 on the file of the Special Court under A. P. Land grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad (for short the special Court )

( 2 ) W. P-NO. 23232/95 is filed by the A. P. Housing Board (Respondent No. 22 in lgc ). W. P. No. 22580/95 is filed by one p. Abraham (Respondent No. 4 in lgc ). W. P. No. 8797/96 is filed by r. Hemalatha, G. Venkateswarlu and smt. D. Venkayamma (Respondents 34 to 36 in LGC) and W. P. No. 9565/96 is filed by all the 4 applicants in LGC.

( 3 ) SINCE all the writ petitions arise out of same judgment and the point involved is one and the same, they are heard together and disposed of by a common order.

( 4 ) FOR purpose of convenience the parties are referred as arrayed before the Special court.

( 5 ) A few facts which are necessary to dispose of these writ petitions are as follows: Applicants 1 to 3 are the sons and Applicant No. 4 is the wife of late farhatulla. Late Farhatulla owned an extent of Ac. 45. 00 in S. Nos. 45 to 48 of yousufguda village in the limits of golkonda Mandal. The said extent was acquired by the Gover















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top