SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 674

Y.V.NARAYANA
J. R. Ramesh Kumar, Rameshji – Appellant
Versus
N. Prabhakar Rao – Respondent


Y. V. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) REVISION Petitioner is the landlord. He filed R. C. No. 355 of 1980 on the file of the principal Rent Controller, Secunderabad for eviction against the respondent-tenant under Section 10 (2) (i) of the A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short the Rent Control Act ) on the ground that the tenant committed wilful default, unauthorized sub-lease of a portion of the petition schedule premises and also on the ground of bona fide requirement of residential portion of the petition schedule premises for personal occupation and also on the ground that the landlord requires the non-residential portion for the purpose of business which he is carrying on as on the date of application.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience the revision petitioner would be referred to as landlord and the respondent as tenant .

( 3 ) THE factual matrix leading to the filing of the revision petition is set out as hereunder:- The revision petitioner is the landlord of the building bearing Municipal assessment No. 7-3-181 to 183 and 209 situate at Ghasmandi, Secunderabad. A portion of the said building comprising of municipal Assessment No. 7-3-183 consisting of









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top