SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 754

A.GOPAL REDDY
Narra Koteswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Eluru – Respondent


A. GOPAL REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Art. 226 of the constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari for calling the records and quash the order dt. 28-2-2000 made in PGA no. 5/1999 on the file of the first respondent by declaring as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

( 2 ) THE petitioner who worked as manager (Administration) of the third respondent-Company moved the second respondent for payment of gratuity under sec. 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act (for short p. G. Act, 1972 ) by filing an application under Sec. 7 (4) of the P. G. Act 1972 r/w Rule 10 (1) of A. P. Payment of gratuity Rules. The second respondent by his order dt. 5-9-99 dismissed the application holding that he had no jurisdiction to entertain the application as the third respondent establishment is having offices in several States and advising the petitioner to file a claim petition before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Central ). Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the first respondent in PGA No. 5/99. The first respondent by the impugned order dismissed the appeal













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top