BILAL NAZKI
Golikota Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Goli Raja Gopala Reddy – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a revision against an order by which the Executing Court has kept in abeyance an order passed by it earlier. By the earlier order in E. A. 98/2000 in E. P. 27/2000 in O. S. 220/91, the Court had directed ;"11-2-2000petition is allowed. S. I. of Police of Chintalapudi shall give necessary police aid for implementing the Civil Court decree passed on O. S. No. 220/91 dated 30-10-99 by the Prl. Sub-Court, Eluru. "thereafter, it appears that the judgment-debtor moved an application on which an order was passed on 14-2-2000 as under;"14-2-2000call on 15-2-2000 for counter. Till such time police aid is kept in abeyance subject to the condition that the petitioner shall not cut and remove the coconuts and turmeric. "this order is now challenged in this revision petition.
( 2 ) BEFORE the controversy is resolved certain facts are needed to be gone into. In a suit for injunction a decree was passed by the trial Court in the following terms:"in the result, the suit is decreed in part with proportionate costs in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants declaring that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the plaint. A-schedule land not withstanding the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.