SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 1023

K.B.SIDDAPPA
Rajigiri Gopala Rao – Appellant
Versus
Boddupalli Prakasarao – Respondent


K. B. SIDDAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is filed against the order passed in I. A. No. 987/93 in o. S. No. 196/93 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Gudivada by which the Munsif granted police protection as prayed for. Aggrieved by the said order, the respondents in the said LA. filed this revision.

( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that police protection can be granted for implementing the positive injunction order in favour of respondents. However, as there is no such positive order in favour of the defendants, the injunction petition of the plaintiff was to be dismissed. Therefore, the order under revision is liable to be set aside.

( 3 ) IN support of his contention the learned counsel relied on the judgment of this Court in J. Sambamurthy vs. Ch. Srinivasa Rao wherein, it was held that the temporary injunction sought for by the defendants against the plaintiff in a suit cannot be granted. Such an injunction can be granted only when there is a counter claim or set off. It is also held that while it is the plaintiff who gets positive relief in the main suit and for that purpose pays the Court fee, the defendant does not get any positive relief in t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top