SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 137

GODA RAGHURAM
N. A. Radha – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. , Revenue Department – Respondent


GODA RAGHURAM, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners, partners of the erstwhile m/s. Vikram Industries, Kakinada, in these proceedings sought a declaration that sec. 52-A of A. P. Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 (for short the Act ) is unconstitutional and that the action of the A. P. State Finance corporation (R-2) seeking to enforce its dues by the notices dt. 5-10-88 and 15-11-88, against the petitioners under the provisions of the Act, is illegal.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief: (A) M/s. Vikram Industries, Kakinada, a partnership firm was sanctioned a term loan of Rs. 67,000/- in 1971, to meet part of the cost of the land, buildings, plant and machinery and for setting up a unit for manufacture of melamine products. The petitioners are stated to have run the unit for a time but without any payment i. e. , towards instalments or interest. (B) Two individuals Jagarlamudi Durga prasad and Marine Sambasivaram (impleaded as respondents 3 and 4 in the writ petition, but against whom the writ petition was dismissed, for default, by this court s order dt. 22-6-99) are stated by the petitioners to have been admitted into the partnership along with the petitioners on 1-1-1981 under a registered partnership deed

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top