SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 125

MOTILAL B.NAIK, S.ANANDA REDDY
Y. Prakasham – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnamc – Respondent


( 1 ) THE petitioners seek a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings No. E1/1223-A/98-1, dated 26-11-1999 on the file of the 1st respondent and seek to set aside the same and consequently seek a direction to the 1st respondent to continue the petitioners as sub-Registrars, Grade-II with all benefits and pass such other orders in the circumstances of the case.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioners, the first petitioner was initially appointed as Sharaff in the year 1982, later promoted to the posts of Junior Assistant and Senior Assistant in the years 1985 and 1990 respectively. He was further promoted to the post of sub Registrar, Grade II in the year 1995 in the panel vacancy. The second petitioner was initially appointed as Temporary Section writer in the year 1979 and promoted to the posts of Junior Assistant and Senior assistants in the years 1990 and 1992 respectively. He was promoted to the Post of Sub-Registrar, Grade II in the backlog vacancy reserved for Scheduled Caste candidates in the year 1998. The third petitioner was initially appointed as Section writer in the year 1975 and later promoted to the posts of Junior Assistant and Senior assist











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top