SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1037

S. P. KURDUKAR, A. S. ANAND, G. B. PATTANAIK, K. VENKATASWAMI, J. JAGANNADHA RAO
Jatinder Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.-In this judgment we shall deal with certain appeals relating to officers of the State of Punjab. We shall also deal with Interlocutory Applications Nos. 10-12/98 filed by the Rail­ways and IAs 4-6 by the Union of India. We shall also deal with cer­tain contempt applications and other Interlocutory applications.

I. C.A. Nos. 316-317/99 :

2. The two appeals C.A. Nos. 316-317/99 have been preferred by the gener­al candidates of Punjab against the judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in CWPs 10756 of 1997 and 10759 of 1997 dated 8.10.1998. The High Court, in the judgment under appeal, followed Jagdish Lal & Ors. v. State of Punjab1 in preference to the judgment in Ajit Singh Januja & Ors. v. State of Punjab2, hereinafter called Ajit Singh No. I. The officers here belong to the Punjab Education Department and the con­test is for the post of Principals governed by the Punjab Education Service (School and Inspection Cadre) (Class II) Rules, 1976.

3. Today, we have delivered judgment in IAs 1 to 3 filed in Ajit Singh by the State of Punjab (C.As. 3792-94 /89). That judgment will be described here as Ajit Singh (II) for convenience.

4. The facts of these two


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top