S.V.MARUTHI
D. Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
DIST. COLLECTOR, KRISHNA – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE three writ petitions are disposed of by a common judgment as the issues involved are more or less common to all the writ petitions.
( 2 ) W. P. No. 17068/97 was filed by four petitioners who are owners of Ac. 5-10 cents in NTS No. l of Block No. 9 of Machavaram village, Vijayawada urban Mandal, Krishna District. Originally the writ petition was filed claiming compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the L. A. Act ) on the basis of the notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the L. A. Act on 13-1-1997 on the ground that the earlier notifications have lapsed. Later on the petitioners have filed an Amendment Petition in W. P. M. P. No. 23246/98 seeking an amendment of the prayer which was allowed on 10-7-1998. By the virtue of this Amendment Petition, the petitioners are seeking a Writ of mandamus declaring the notifications dated 5-11-1979 and 25-1-1990 issued by the 2nd respondent under Section 4 (1) of the L. A. Act as illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and to direct the respondents to initiate proceedings under section 11 of the L. A. Act and to pass award and
H.M.KELOGIRAO Vs GOVT. OF Andhra Pradesh
SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LTD, CHAIRMAN, KOTHAGUDEM Vs V.Satyansrayana Murthy
Dy.Collector, L.A., Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, Visakhapatnam Vs M.J.Swamy
A.V.Papayya Sastry Vs State of A.P., rep.by Us Secretary, Land Acquisition, Hyderabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.