B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) ALL these writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order, as the same question arises for consideration in all these writ petitions.

( 2 ) THE dispute relates to the appointment of Law Officers in Nizamabad District. The mode, method and procedure adopted by the learned District and Sessions Judge is assailed in this batch of writ petitions. All the petitioners herein are practising Advocates in various Courts in Nizamabad District. According to them, they are vitally interested in upholding the dignity of the members of the Bar. All the petitioners are unanimous in asserting that no member of the Bar should solicit work from any client including the Government. According to them no Advocate should make any application to whatsoever authority seeking appointment as the Government Pleader, Public Prosecutor, Additional Public Prosecutor, Assistant Government Pleader etc. , as the case may be. Such applications, according to them, would amount to soliciting the work from the Government. Yet they have chosen to file these writ petitions for setting aside the panel prepared by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nizamabad and consequentia

Click Here to Read the rest of this document