B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE subject-matter of this revision petition arises under the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short the Rent Control Act ). The unsuccessful landlord is the revision petitioner. The respondent is the tenant in a non-residential premises, admittedly owned by the petitioner. There is no dispute whatsoever with regard to the ownership of the petition schedule premises. There is also no dispute with regard to the jurat relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner herein filed RC No. 604 of 1988 on the file of the II Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, under Section 10 (3) (b) and 10 (2) (ii) (b) of the Rent Control Act, for the eviction of the respondent/tenant from the premises consisting of ground floor Mulgi and first floor portion bearing Municipal No. 21-2-7, situated at Pathargatti, Hyderabad (herein after referred to as the Premises ). The eviction of the respondent/tenant herein is sought mainly on the ground that the premises is required for the own business purposes of the petitioner and he is under the bona fide need of the premises. It is also the case of the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document