B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Kathala Yellaiah – Appellant
Versus
Kathala Chandraiah – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner-plaintiffs are the appellants in this CMA. This appeal itself is directed against an order passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Mahaboobnagar dismissing the application for injunction filed by the appellants herein against the respondents. The trial Court after an elaborate consideration of the matter and upon appreciation of the documentary evidence and material available on record came to the conclusion that the appellants herein are not entitled for any relief of temporary injunction in their favour. In the trial Court, Exs. A1 to A27 were marked on behalf of the appellants herein and Exs. B1 to B8 were marked on behalf of the respondents.
( 2 ) THE appellants herein claimed to be in possession of an extent of Ac. 15. 09 gts. in Sy. No. 144 situated at Chokkalonigudem, Kondurg of Mahaboobnagar District. It is their case that the petition schedule land originally belonged to one Nalamoni Ramaiah and on his death his wife Nalamoni Venkatamma succeeded to the same and continued in possession till the year 1974-75. It is their case that during the year 1975-76 appellants 1 and 2 have occupied an extent of Ac. 7. 00 and Ac. 3. 00 respec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.