SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 610

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, MOTILAL B.NAIK
Anakala Maddileti – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , Home Department, Hyderabad – Respondent


MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) IN all these writ petitions the orders passed by the detaining authorities ordering the detention of the detenus are questioned on various grounds and consequently a writ of habeas corpus is also sought directing the production of the detenus before this Court and set them at liberty and pass appropriate orders.

( 2 ) AS the question involved in all these writ petitions is the detention order passed by the detaining authorities under Section 3 (2) read with Section 3 (1) of A. P. Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot Leggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (for short "act 1 of 1986") all these writ petitions are therefore taken up together and are being decided by this common order.

( 3 ) FEW facts relating to each writ petition are stated as under : WP No. 6375 of 1999 : One Telaga Maddileti son of Chinnaiah a resident of Chinna Develapuram village, Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District has alleged that one Telaga Jayanna, son of Maddileti aged about 25 years a resident of Chinna Devalapuram village, Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool district was ordered to be detained by the orders passed by the




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top