A.S.ANAND, S.R.PANDIAN
Harpreet Kaur (Mrs) Harvinder Singh Bedi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. A. S. ANAND, J.:- Leave is granted in SLP(Cri) No. 3227 of 1991. Writ Petition No. 1247 of 1991 filed under Art. 32 of the Constitution of India is also taken up for disposal along with the aforesaid appeal, which is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 597 of 1991, since it is same order of detention which has been called in question in both the cases.
2. Both the appeal and the Writ Petition have been filed by the wife of one Harvinder Singh alias Kukku, who has been detained vide order of detention, dated 26th February 1991, issued under the provisions of Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Siumlords, Bootleggers and Drug Offenders Act, 1981 Hereinafter referred to as the Act). The appellant had questioned the detention of her husband through Criminal Writ Petition No. 597 of 1991 before the Bombay High Court on various grounds. The High Court, however, did not find any merit in the challenge and being of the opinion that there was no infirmity in the order of detention dismissed the Writ Petition. Appellant has filed an appeal by Special Leave against the High Cour
Ashok Kumar v. Delhi Administration
Subhash Bhandari v. District Magistrate, Lucknow
Omprakash v. Commissioner of Police
Rashidmiya v. Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad
Piyush Kantilal Mehta v. Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad City
State of U.P. v. Hari Shankar Tewari
Ahmedhussain Shaikhussain v. Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad
T. Devaki v. government of T.N.
relied on : Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.