SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 654

V.BHASKARA RAO
MD. KUTUBUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
BHAIKAR RAJA MITRAJI ANAND KUMAR – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE five Civil Revision Petitions are directed against the orders in LA. No. 210 of 1995 in R. C. A. No. 108 of 1988, LA. No. 208 of 1995 in R. C. A. No. 107 of 1988, LA. No. 206 of 1995 in R. C. A. No. 106 of 1988, la, No. 212 of 1995 in R. C. A. No. 109 of 1988 and LA. No. 214 of 1995 in R. C. A. No. 110 of 1988, on the file of Senior Civil Judge, vizianagaram, dated 20-1-1997 allowing the amendment of pleadings under Order VI rule 17 Code of Civil Procedure read with rule 28 of Civil Rules of Practice. Since common questions of law and fact are involved they are being disposed of by a common order.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT Nos. 1 to 3, who are the landlords, filed eviction petitions against five different tenants, who are the revision petitioners herein, contending that they purchased the building consisting of several portions which are in occupation of the aforesaid tenants by a registered sale deed dated 7-12-1984 as members of Joint Hindu family. The eviction petitions were dismissed by the Rent Controller, vizianagaram. Hence, they preferred five appeals namely R. C. A. Nos. 108, 107,106, 109 and 110 of 1988. The parties will be referred to as appellants-


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top