SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1202

A.HANUMANTHU
Raj Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Jonnalagadda Satyanarayana and Sons – Respondent


A. HANUMANTHU, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31-1-1992 passed in R. C. A. No. 108/ 82 on the file of the Subordinate Judge at Vijayawada reversing the order of the Rent Controller in R. C. C. No. 31/81.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are as follows: The respondents (sic. petitioners) 4 and 5 herein and their brother late rajakumar Sharma whose legal representatives are petitioners, 1,2 and 3 (for the sake of convenience called as land-lords hereafter) filed the eviction petition R. C. C. No. 31/81 under Section 10 (2) (i) and Section 10 (3) (a) (iii) (a) of a. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act (Act 15 of 1960) (hereinafter called as the act ) on the grounds of wilful default in payment of rent and also on the ground of requiring the building for starting the existing business carried on by them in the non-residential premises let out to the respondent herein (referred as tenant ). The tenant resisted that application 5 by filing a counter denying the allegations made in the petition. During the trial, the 5th petitioner herein was examined as P. W. I and Exs. A-1 to A-5 were marked. On behalf of the tenant, its proprietor by na








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top