SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 712

A.GOPAL REDDY
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Janarasupalli Kotiratnamma – Respondent


A. GOPAL REDDY, J.

( 1 ) ALL these appeals by the insurance company arise out of the common orders and decrees dated 22. 10. 1994 in three batches of petitions, i. e. , (1) O. P. Nos, 10, 11, 12 and 14 of 1993; (2) O. P. Nos. 13 and 65 of 1993; and (3) O. P. Nos. 15 and 16 of 1993 on the file of I Additional District Judge-cum-Motor accidents Claims Tribunal, Karimnagar. As the question of law involved in all these appeals is one and the same, I propose to dispose them of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) C. M. A. Nos. 30, 32, 31 and 34 of 1995 which arise out of O. P. Nos. 10, 12, 11 and 14 of 1993 respectively are filed by the same claimants. O. P. No. 10 of 1993 is filed under section 166 of the Motor vehicles Act (for short the Act ) and O. P. No. 12 of 1993 is filed under section 140 of the Act for the death of Sreenu s/o claimant No. 1 in the above O. Ps. O. P. Nos. 11 and 14 of 1993 are filed under sections 166 and 140 of the Act (Sic.) the husband of the respondent No. 1 herein and father of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein. C. M. A. Nos. 33 and 37 of 1995 arise out of O. P. Nos. 13 and 65 of 1993 filed under sections 166 and 140 of the act, by the wife and two sons and a daugh















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top