SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 960

J.CHELAMESWAR
KCP Ltd. , Guntur – Appellant
Versus
APSEB, Vidyut soudha, Hyderabad – Respondent


J. CHALAMESWAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in Writ petition No. 16587 of 1990 is a Public limited Company registered under the companies Act, 1956 and it had setup among other things a Cement Plant at Macherla in guntur District. The petitioner questions the legality and validity of levy and collection of Rs. 18 lakhs towards service line charges and Rs. 20,000/- towards service connection charges for releasing an additional load of 3000 KVA. The petitioner also questions the legality and validity of BPMS No. 1160 (Commercial), dated 3-11-1989 and also the mode of computation of service line charges as illegal and ultra vires of the provisions of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

( 2 ) THE brief facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are as under: The petitioner-Company entered into an agreement with the 1st respondent-Board and is availing electricity supply for its cement Plant at Macherla classified as High tension (HT) consumer. The petitioner was initially availing supply at a voltage of 11 kv. The 1st respondent-Board issued BPMS no. 607, dated 21-7-1981 whereunder the consumers availing HT supply were required to change over to the stipulated voltages depending on thei
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top