( 1 ) THE petitioner is a resident of Warangal town. He is aggrieved by the proceedings of the first respondent in roc. No. G2/uc/13358/96, dated 4-5-1998. Apart from not being able to satisfactorily explain the delay in approaching the Court assailing the order passed about one year ago, the petitioner has chosen a wrong remedy in a wrong forum. The petitioner should be non-suited as the writ petition is a frivolous and vexatious one. These introductory remarks are not without any justification. As the case unfolds as here under, these remarks would be justified.

( 2 ) THE second respondent is unfortunately the neighbour of the petitioner. He obtained a building permission under municipal Corporation Act on 26-5-1993. According to the petitioner, the permit is for raising ground floor residential structure. However, it is alleged that the second respondent in utter violation of the plan as well as the zoning regulations extended the construction towards north where allegedly the petitioner s property is situated. The construction was completed and according to the petitioner the officials of the first respondent are in collusion with the second respondent and hence