SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 1077

C.V.N.SASTRY
Shaik Abdul Khader – Appellant
Versus
Vakantham Nagabhushana Rao – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS is asecond Appealby the unsuccessful plaintiffs in the suit. The suit was filed for declaration of title and for permanent injunction in respect of the plaint A and B schedule properties. Subsequently, the suit was converted into one for possession also.

( 2 ) IT is the case of the plaintiffs that the 1st defendant who was the original owner of the suit properties sold the same to his daughter julekha Bi and her husband Kutubuddin (P. W. 2) under three Registered Sale deeds dated 22-8-1955 22-8-1955 and 10-4-1957 marked as Exs. A-1 to A-3 respectively and that they in turn sold the same to Plaintiffs 1 and 2 under Registered sale Deed dated 15-2-1974 (Ex. A-4 ). It is the further case of the plaintiffs that the 1st defendant subsequently executed asham and nominal sale deed dated 8-4-1974 (Ex. B-26) covering the suit properties in favour of defendants 2 and 3. As defendants 2 and 3 tried to interfere with the suit properties under the guise of the sale deed obtained by them the plaintiffs filed the present suit.

( 3 ) AS regards the plaint B schedule properties, it is the case of the plaintiffs that the said properties originally belonged to one Kulsum Bi and her husband














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top