B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
V. Murali – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE three writ petitions may be disposed of by a common order, as they are inter-related and the subject matter that arises for consideration is one and the same
( 2 ) THE petitioner in W. P. No. 9710 of 1992 obtained a quarry lease for Road Metal and building stone over an extent of 1. 00 hectare in Sy. No. 4 of Pokeru village, bheemunipatnam Taluk, Visakhapatnam district for a period of five years under proceedings dated 24-9-1985 from the Asst. Director of Mines and Geology, visakhapatnam. The lease deed was executed on 21-12-1985 for a period of five years and valid upto 20-12-1990. The Asst. Director by an order dated 24-9-1990 rejected the request of the petitioner for grant of renewal on the ground that the petitioner was in arrears of Rs. 20,017/- payable to the Government. The petitioner filed an appeal before the Director of Mines and Geology. The Director by an order dated 20-2-1991 rejected the appeal.
( 3 ) THEREAFTER the petitioner claims to have filed an appeal to the Principal secretary on 5-3-1991. The order passed by the appellate authority was confirmed by the Government on 13-11-1991 and communicated the same to the petitioner. The o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.