SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 1159

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
V. Murali – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE three writ petitions may be disposed of by a common order, as they are inter-related and the subject matter that arises for consideration is one and the same

( 2 ) THE petitioner in W. P. No. 9710 of 1992 obtained a quarry lease for Road Metal and building stone over an extent of 1. 00 hectare in Sy. No. 4 of Pokeru village, bheemunipatnam Taluk, Visakhapatnam district for a period of five years under proceedings dated 24-9-1985 from the Asst. Director of Mines and Geology, visakhapatnam. The lease deed was executed on 21-12-1985 for a period of five years and valid upto 20-12-1990. The Asst. Director by an order dated 24-9-1990 rejected the request of the petitioner for grant of renewal on the ground that the petitioner was in arrears of Rs. 20,017/- payable to the Government. The petitioner filed an appeal before the Director of Mines and Geology. The Director by an order dated 20-2-1991 rejected the appeal.

( 3 ) THEREAFTER the petitioner claims to have filed an appeal to the Principal secretary on 5-3-1991. The order passed by the appellate authority was confirmed by the Government on 13-11-1991 and communicated the same to the petitioner. The o

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top