SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 1145

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
V. Venkata Rao – Appellant
Versus
Transport Commissioner and Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kakinada – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in the instant writ petitior challenge Memo No. 20081/a1/99 dated 16-10-1999 issued by the first respondent herein directing the petitioners to stop plying of the operation of the vehicles on the inter-state route (1) Yanam to Rajahmundry and (2) Yanam to jaganniakpuram.

( 2 ) BEFORE adverting to the question as to the validity of the impugned Memo the facts, in some what detail, may have to be noticed: The petitioners are the transport operators. They have applied for grant of inter-state permits on the routes (1) Yanam to Rajahmundry and (2) Yanam to jagannaiakapuram. The State Transport authority, Pondicherry, vide proceedings no. TD/pp/1/40/94, dated 31-10-1994 granted stage carriage permits for a period of five years. However, the Secretary, State transport Authority, Andhra Pradesh, refused to countersign the permits so granted by the State Transport Authority, pondicherry and informed the State transport Authority, Pondicherry that the routes in question are covered by the approved schemes of the Andhra Pradesh state Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) and the conditions of the permit do not permit granting fresh permits in favour



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top