SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 30

B.K.SOMASEKHARA, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA
J. Siva Sankara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Prl. Secretary to Govt. , Transport, Roads and Buildings (Road-II-I) Dept. , Hyderabad – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THE question for consideration in this writ appeal s whether a writ can be issued in a matter which is purely contractual in nature not arising out of a statute nor depriving any fundamental right nor even a discriminatory order. This question has been answered not in one case but in a catena of decisions of both the Supreme Court and the High Courts.

( 2 ) BEFORE answering this question, it is appropriate to narrate a few facts which gave rise to this appeal. The appellant is a contractor. The 2nd respondent herein, viz. , the Chief Engineer, National Highways, Errum Manzil, Hyderabad put up for auction the annual rights to collect toll fee at Kanakadurgamma varadhi across the river Krishna for the period from 1-4-1992 to 31-3-1993. The appellant-petitioner was the highest bidder and he offered a sum of Rs. 1,07,15,000. 00. The same was accepted by the 2nd respondent. The Government by its order in G. O. Rt. No. 278, Transport, Roads and Buildings (Roads-II-I) Department dated 23-3-1992 accepted the said recommendations of the Chief Engineer, the 2nd respondent herein. The same was confirmed by the 2nd Respondent and the right of collection of toll fe









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top