SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 205

P. N. SHINGHAL, R. S. SARKARIA, JASWANT SINGH, A. N. RAY
Sham Lal: Aala Ram Surinder Singh Bhagwandas And Company: Tarlok Singh Lahna Singh And Company – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SARKARIA, J.:— This judgment will govern the disposal of these eight appeals filed on the strength of certificates of fitness granted by the High Court of Punjab of Haryana.

2. The appellants have been carrying on business as liquor contractors. At the annual excise auctions held for the year 1968-69, they were the highest bidders for the country liquor vends at various places in the State of Punjab and the auctions were knocked down in their favour.

3. Since the question involved and basic facts - with immaterial variations - are common, it will be sufficient to refer to the facts of the case giving rise to Civil Appeal 1641 of 1971, in which only arguments have been specifically addressed to us by Shri T. S. Munjral, counsel for the appellant. The appellant-firm in this case gave the highest bids of Rs. 2,64,000/- and Rupees 1,03,000/- respectively, and got licences in Form L-14 for retail country liquor vends at Jandiala and Bundala in Jullundur District. The material conditions of the licences announced at the auction and accepted by the appellants, were that annual quotas of liquor (in proof litres) for the vends at Jandiala and Bundala were 11,000 and 4600 proofs, resp

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top