SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 36

AVINASH SOMAKANT BHATE, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
A. B. SRINIVASAN – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. REP,, BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, C. J.

( 1 ) THE appellant herein filed W. P. No. 12775 of 1997 questioning the order dated 10-6-1997 passed by the third respondent consequent to the order of the second respondent dt. 7-6-1997 directing transfer of the petitioner from sri Swamy Hathiramji Mutt, Tirupathi to Sri Veeranjaneya Swamy Temple, gandi, Cuddapah District. The petitioner was working as Senior Assistant in Sri Swamy Hathiramji Mutt, which is an institution governed by the provisions of A. P. Chari table and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments act. The said institution is being administered by the custodian of the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Endowments. As regards the circumstances warranting the transfer of petitioner, it cannot be gainsaid that there is adequate and ample material as disclosed from the averments in the counter- affidavit. The only point urged before us by the learned Counsel for the appellant is that the Commissioner of Endowment (Respondent No. 2) has no jurisdiction to direct transfer of the employees from one religious institution to another religious institution, notwithstanding Sec. 39 of the Act. The learned single Judge, following the latest decision









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top